I was at the movie theatre recently, and before the feature even began, a trailer caught my attention: the new film adaptation of Wuthering Heights. It reminded me of a recurring phenomenon in both the creative arts and in markets – familiar stories are repackaged as something fresh. 

Classic adaptations often arrive with equal parts excitement and skepticism. The new Wuthering Heights film is no different. The marketing promises a timeless love story. Sweeping moors. Passion. Tragedy, maybe, but the beautiful kind. Yet anyone who has read Emily Brontë knows that Wuthering Heights is far darker than its romantic imaging suggests. It is a gothic tale of obsession, cruelty, and psychological trauma.  

Take Heathcliff’s famous words after Catherine’s death:
“Be with me always - take any form - drive me mad! only do not leave me in this abyss, where I cannot find you! Oh, God! it is unutterable! I can not live without my life! I can not live without my soul!” 

The quote refers to Heathcliff experiencing a level of grief that borders on spiritual crisis. He is saying that even a terrifying, sanity-shattering ghost is better than total absence. To Heathcliff, the horror of being haunted is a mercy compared to the horror of being alone.  

Adaptations often soften these truths, trading darkness for mood, music, and romance. The story itself remains the same; it is the lens through which we view it that has changed.  

We do not actually crave new stories. We crave the feeling of novelty. A new perspective. A new medium. A new cover on a very old book. It is an instinct that serves us well in art. Less so elsewhere.  

Because it turns out this habit of mistaking the familiar for the unprecedented does not stop at books or movies. It shows up in far more consequential places, especially in markets. 

The familiar and the novel 

French novelist Patrick Modiano, Nobel laureate, has remarked that, like every novelist, he is always writing the same book. (On fait toujours le même roman.) 

This is not a confession. It is an observation. It is an acknowledgment of something deeper, and more honest, about how stories work. What changes from book to book, from story to story, from market to market, is not the theme, but the angle. 

The setting shifts. The names are different. The details evolve. Yet the gravitational pull remains the same. 

Modiano is making an observation that the forces that shape human experience do not actually change all that much. We are drawn back to the same questions because they never stop being relevant. 

Which raises the question: why would we expect markets to be any different? 

This time is different 

Every market cycle comes with its own justification for why the past no longer applies.  

Technology evolves. Geopolitics shift. Leadership changes. New industries emerge while old one’s fade. It is not hard to convince ourselves that we are standing at an inflection point rather than somewhere along a familiar arc. 

And to be fair, there is always some truth in that. 

Today’s markets are not the markets of a decade ago. Artificial intelligence is reshaping entire industries. Capital moves faster. Information travels instantly. Every cycle brings real change and dismissing that outright would be just as dangerous as ignoring history altogether. 

This is what makes the phrase “this time is different” so tempting. 

It does not present itself as recklessness. It reads like insight. Like adaptability. Like an ability to recognize that the world is dynamic, not static. Often, it’s wrapped in compelling evidence, new narratives, that appear to justify a clean break from what came before. 

The trouble is that every era has had its own version of this argument. 

In hindsight, the specifics always look different. The themes rarely do. Narratives can outrun fundamentals, until they cannot. Leadership narrows, then broadens. Conditions reward risk, until they do not. Assets once dismissed as obsolete reassert their relevance. Capital migrates. Behavior repeats. 

The details change. 

The plot stays remarkably consistent. 

Which raises a question worth pausing on before we go any further. 

Are we actually reading a new book? Or are we just look at the same one with better cinematography? 

Markets as familiar plots 

Markets in 2025 offered no shortage of reasons to believe the story had changed. Equity markets extended a multi-year run, leadership started to broaden after a period of extreme concentration, and while artificial intelligence remained a dominant force, the narrative around it evolved. The market shrugged off what, on the surface, should have been real headwinds: tariffs, geopolitical uncertainty, housing market stress, and rising macro concerns that might have derailed a less confident market. 

What did change was the narrative around which sectors mattered: the AI theme remained dominant, but its cast shifted, and investors pushed deeper into areas they had previously ignored. Yet even here, familiar patterns emerged.  

Early signs of stress appeared first in credit and bond markets, and valuations on mega-cap winners looked stretched even as broad indices rallied. This is not to deny novelty; it is to recognize that the actors rotate and the setting evolves, but the plot, a market that periodically tests the limits of optimism before re-pricing risk, remains consistent. And sometimes the biggest surprise is not what is new – it is what suddenly feels relevant again. 

That dynamic showed up most clearly in what was once considered old stories: gold and silver. Throughout the year, these commodities shrugged off their historical relic status and delivered standout performance, even as risk assets climbed higher. A weaker U.S. dollar, sticky inflation, and continued central bank reserve buying combined to make precious metals one of the top-performing themes of 2025, not because they transformed, but because the conditions that once made them matter quietly returned. 

Gold did not change, our memory did. 

And that speaks to something deeper about markets, especially as we look ahead. It can feel repetitive to revisit the same principles year after year, yet behavior rarely changes because information is new; it changes because reminders are consistent. Patrick Modiano articulated it with equal honesty for storytellers. The best investors, like the best writers, are not chasing novelty, they are refining clarity.  

So, as narratives compete to convince us that “this time is different,” it is worth pausing to ask whether we are encountering something genuinely new or simply revisiting a familiar story in a new medium.  

Because often the most dangerous words in markets are not “this time is different,” they are: “I’ve never seen this before.” Chances are, you have. You are just reading Wuthering Heights on a different screen. 

Please read important disclosures at www.penderfund.com/fr/disclaimer/. 

Standard performance data for Pender Funds can be found at www.penderfund.com/solutions/